Cancer Research: What Are The Results So Far

By Jason Myers

The intransigent, self serving, close mindedness of some affiliates of organized medicine is being shattered by sharp truths fired by scientists from all parts the country.

It is becoming embarrassingly apparent to the huge "Cancer Research" associations, that no matter how much guinea pig volunteers at U.S. penitentiaries they vaccinate with liver cancer cells, the subjects do not get tumor. Regardless of how much time is wasted performing this experiment and how much public money is utilized in a benighted attempt to square a circle, the shine of the words, "There is no cancer in normal metabolism," grows brighter.

This perspective is no longer as controversial as it was before. Nowadays, a doctor from the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation can tell the board of trustees of the Allergy Foundation that allergy is believed to be closely related to the natural process of immunity, which include the body's manufacture of antibodies to combat invasion by germs, and that proof of many types has revealed that aspects in the body's resistance are associated closely with the foundation and subsequent course of human cancer.

Theorists have recommended that cancer cells may grow from time to time in the typical body, but that many of these are sufficiently abnormal to be striked effectively by the body's natural defenses. Today, it is turning out to be more and more difficult to deny the function of the liver in cancer, especially since the detection of the TIP - Tumour Inhibitory Principle - which is created by this organ. The normal liver produces a chemical factor that effectively slows down growth of new cancer in mice. The factor is imparted both to the blood serum and to the bile and has not been found in cancer patients.

The evidence implies the premise that shortage, either inherited or obtained, of such inhibitory factors may be fundamental to the cause of cancer. - 30285

About the Author:

Sign Up for our Free Newsletter

Enter email address here